Sunday, December 9, 2007

Prediction: The Decreasing Importance of Management Experience

I am sure that this will be a controversial post. VCs and private equity investors have long held that some variation of the following framework is the best to validate a potential investment:
  • Strength of the management team
  • Strength of the market dynamics (size, share, competition, etc.)
  • Strength of the product / service
  • Strength of the business model, financial results, balance sheet
  • Favorability of the deal terms

There is also widespread agreement (in my opinion) that of these criteria two are dramatically more important than the others (probably much more important than the others combined). These are management and market. This leads to one of the oldest questions in the industry: which is more imporant management or market. Put another way: should you bet on the jockey or the horse?

I think that the industry probably falls into two groups here: 75-80% of investors believe that management is the most important and 20-25% believe market is more important. I don't know if it is true but Sequoia capital has the reputation of falling into the latter category. It is a minority category but an important minority.

Generally speaking when VCs talk about the strength of the management team, they mean that the management team has certain credentials--directly relevant industry experience, previous startup experience. The CEO, who is equal in importance to probably the rest of the entire team combined, should probably be a serial, and serially successful, venture or private-equity backed entrepreneur.

I know that this is controversial but I think that for a broad range of startups the importance of management team experience is really starting to fade. I cite as examples basically every major Internet success story over the past 5 years from MySpace, to Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, to Skype, to the Google guys, to Chad Hurley at YouTube, etc. It seems like the decreasing barriers to entrepreneurship, which, on the web, are falling faster that consumer confidence is right now, is creating a challenge to a centrally held tenet of the VC model for the past 50 years. But maybe youth or at least youthfulness in spirit has always a key factor in successful startups. Look at Bill Gates or Steve Jobs for example. Neither of these geniuses were serial entrepreneurs before starting their first major success. I don't know where I come down on this one just yet but I think it is an important and intriguing topic for debate.

3 Comments:

Blogger Thom said...

I think you're skewing your data by looking at the huge wins. If you're Sequoia, or you're just generally more interested in hitting one home run than several doubles and triples, then sure, bet on the market and inexperienced but smart and passionate executives. It's a strategic decision about playing the odds, in my opinion.

Of course, this is all speculation. I'd love to see data to support this. Maybe Shane has something to say on it (via Guy).

January 8, 2008 9:30 AM  
Blogger VentureReturns said...

Thom, thanks for your comment. You may be right but with some research I know I could produce hundreds of examples of "smaller" outcomes that also confirm the trend. I do think that this is much more of an "Internet-company" phenomenon right now.

January 8, 2008 9:51 AM  
Blogger Thom said...

Okay, so for now I'll assume that you can produce that data. My next question is whether there's something special about high tech that makes management experience less important, or if management experience has always been less important to success than experienced managers want to believe. My gut feeling is that it's the latter; that "experienced management team" has always been something of a hazing routine.

January 24, 2008 8:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home